Virtualized CentOS5 via VirtualBox on Ubuntu
Funny as it may seem, I fell for it (yet again perhaps?). I’ve installed CentOS5 on top of VirtualBox 2.2.2 on my Ubuntu Hardy 8.04 for the sole purpose of testing out ASP.NET hosting using Mono, XSP, and Apache. And I was in for a surprise that I could not access my virtual machine’s Apache web server instance.
I was able to install VirtualBox 2.2.2 vanilla (not the official Ubuntu package) without any problems. I followed it up by installing CentOS5 as a virtual machine. I then proceeded and configured the network interface for the virtual machine on the VirtualBox Management panel, and set it up to use “Bridged” networking.
I proceeded by booting the virtual machine and watched every boot message zip by without a hitch. I then logged into the virtual machine as root and configured the IP address for the network interface. After which, I pinged the IP address and got the reply I want. I then tried to log in via SSH, ang was able to get in. “Hmm… everything seems to be in order. Might as well continue.” I said to myself. Boy was I in for a surprise.
I proceeded and configured the web server, enabling name-based virtual hosting, started Apache and tried to browse the test page. And then… nothing! ACCKK!!! I checked the IPTables rules if there’s something a-miss. So far everything seems to be in order (really?) . Tried a couple more times, and still get a failure from Firefox. Hmmm.. what could it be. Pondering for hours what could have been missed. A colleague suggested to flush the entire set of IPTables rules, which I did and tried accessing the web server. What do you know! I was able to browse the basic landing page. “Hmmm.. there must be something wrong with the IPTables rules” I said whispering.
I proceeded and checked again /etc/sysconfig/iptables and sure enough, I found the culprit. I mistakenly added the IPTables rule that opens port 80 AFTER the reject rule! No wonder port 80 doesn’t open up. I edited the /etc/sysconfig/iptables again, and place the port 80 rule on top of the reject rule, which will then allow it to take effect first, before the reject rule is activated. And then everything worked as it should.
Lesson? Sometimes the obvious things are really hard to find and double checking definitely will prevent the unnecessary debugging for when your system goes to production. I’m just glad this is a simulation system and not production.
I think it was stupid of me not to notice the order of the rules in the iptables file. What do you think?
Technorati 
linux, virtualization, virtualbox, centos5, apache, webserver, iptables
Site Search Tags: linux, virtualization, virtualbox, centos5, apache, webserver, iptables